International Lake Ontario - St. Lawrence
River Study Board
Meeting in Amherst, New York
November 14, 2002 (1300 - 1730) and November 15, 2002 (0800
SUMMARY OF MEETING
Board members in attendance were: Eugene Stakhiv; Doug Cuthbert;
Frank Sciremammano; Andre Carpentier; Pete Loucks; Sandra
LeBarron; Frank Quinn; Marcel Lussier; Dan Barletta; and Jim
Snyder along with Study Managers Tony Eberhardt and Ed Eryuzlu.
Others in attendance for all or part of the meetings were:
Elaine Kennedy; Stephanie Weiss; Henry Stewart; Max Streibel;
Bill Werick; Wendy Leger; Roger Gauthier; Ian Gillespie; Joe
Atkinson; Brad Parker; David Fay; Ralph Moulton; Tom Bender;
Jon Brown; Serge St-Martin; Roger Haberly; Debbie Lee; Amy
Lyttle; Tom McAuley; Russ Trowbridge; Arianne Matte; Arleen
Kreusch; Pete Zuzek; Chris Stewart; Aaron Thompson; Trevor
Elliott; David Klein.
- Agenda approval: The agenda was modified slightly
to allow PIAG to give its update and discuss funding on
the first day of the meeting.
- Reporting out on October 2002 appearance with IJC:
- The Institutional Structures Report was provided to the
Commission and it is being reviewed.
- The Commission agreed that the Plan of Study (1999) should
be retooled to cover activities not originally proposed
in that document, but within the funding framework outlined
in that report.
- The Commission noted the Board's concerns regarding individual
"black box" models.
- In related business regarding membership, the Board:
- Approved the appointment of Brad Parker as Canadian
Lead for the Environmental TWG,
- Is awaiting formal IJC approval for Dan Barletta as
a new Board member and U.S. Lead for PIAG,
- Jon Montan was approved by the IJC as a new PIAG member,
- Paul Finnegan and John Osinski have switched roles
as PIAG member and U.S. Hydroelectric Power TWG Lead, with IJC
- Since Ron Daly declined, the Commission is seeking
another International Great Lakes Coalition member for
- Discussion regarding the University Inn workshop:
A problem that became evident during the workshop was that
many investigators have proposed continuing their data collection
and research work into years 4 and 5 of the Study. In order
to bring Study activities and timing into focus, the General
Managers presented a Gantt Chart.
- The Board confirmed that, as shown in the draft chart,
years 1 through 3 should be the Data Collection Phase and
Plan Formulation Phase, and years 4 through 5 the Plan Evaluation
and Finalisation phase.
- The Board agreed that in some cases, data could be refined
in the later years of the Study, but such should not be
- The TWGs were instructed to review the chart and suggest
changes before the January Board meeting. (The Environmental
TWG seemed to be deviating the most from the chart and the
emphasis during its December 10th meeting in Burlington
should be to refocus activities.)
- Ed and Tony will prepare a memo to the TWGs by Friday,
November 22, instructing them to review the chart and provide
critical timeframes to be incorporated in the chart to fit
in the overall Study timeframes.
- The TWGs should review their approved y-2 work plans and
determine which activities have fallen behind schedule as
part of the mid-term budget adjustments. This information
is due back to the GMs by December 6, 2002.
- The TWGs are to be asked by the GMs also to provide estimates
of y-3 funding requirements for Board review during a conference
call which will take place before Christmas.
- The Board directed all TWGs to incorporate translation
costs in their yearly budget proposals.
- PIAG provided a list of questions that the TWGs will answer
prior to the next PIAG meeting.
- All TWGs must provide a write-up of their economic evaluation
approach by the end of December 2002 and make available
economic data for the Economic Advisory Panel (EAP) organized
- All presenters shall make their presentations available
on the Study FTP site.
- IM TWG will develop metadata template for use by all groups
and PIs to place all technical reports and data on FTP site.
- Specific to TWGs:
- Environmental: Board noted that the ongoing research
was useful, but questioned how it would serve the overall
needs of the Study in terms of establishing criteria and
adapting to the framework of the SVM.
- There should be co-ordination between TWGs to share
- U.S. Year 1 reports of this TWG are due by the end
of November 2002 and all Study reports will be included
on the ftp site.
- The group needs to review the work being performed
by each of its investigators to assure that the needs
of the overall Study are met within the Study schedule.
- An economic advisory panel (EAP) has been established.
- The Board deferred the approval of an economic feasibility
study until it has been addressed by the EAP. The panel
will determine the cost, feasibility and usefulness
of evaluating economics of the environment.
- The PFEG will hire a facilitator for the March workshop
to assist TWG participation and input into the model.
- There will be 3 cycles of plan formulation in 2003,
2004 and 2005. The PFEG will have its first draft of
an alternative plan prior to its March 2003 workshop
with yearly test evaluations in March 2004 and 2005
(final). All TWG milestones will be affected by these
yearly evaluations and information is required by each
group by the January preceding the workshops. The GMs
will draft memos requesting TWG input.
- PFEG needs to budget more realistically in subsequent
years to account for added meetings with PIAG and training
sessions with TWGs.
- Commercial Navigation and Hydroelectric Power: Both groups
need to provide a qualitative assessment of local, regional
and international economic sensitivities.
- Hydroelectric Power TWG: The "White Paper" will
be available for review by the end of calendar year 2002.
- Land use policy differences between the U.S. and
Canada should also be addressed.
- The intent of the "bulk sand budget" approach
proposed by Baird Associates to evaluate erosion must
be made very clear, especially when presenting it to
- Recreational Boating: It was noted that there is
no attempt to differentiate pre- and post-regulation marinas
in its surveys.
- Common Data Needs/ Information Management:
- All GIS mapping must be compliant with IJC/ Common
Data Needs standards.
- Common Data Needs TWG needs an additional $20,000
US to complete wetlands elevation mapping at one site
that was incorrect due to technical sampling errors.
- The Board deferred a final decision on the proposal
that the Great Lakes Commission should manage the web
site for the Study.
- The Board agreed that the IJC should consider providing
additional funding other than from the Study, since
in the proposed approach the site will also serve future
IJC information needs.
- Budget update, review and Board decisions
- Regarding Canadian funding, the Board agreed to the following
mid-term adjustment to the y-2 budgets:
- $70,000 earmarked for the Water Uses TWG can be released
since this amount was provided with U.S. funds to the
- Total Canadian funds amount to $3,408,000 (Cdn $'s)
with the breakdowns as follows (in 1000 Cdn $'s):
|H & H
- Regarding U.S. funding, (in US $'s):
- About $102,000 year 1 funds remained as of September
- Of the $3,246,884 available in year 2, $33,309 was
unspent due to contracts less than estimates.
- $173,625 was provided by the Canadian IJC for Common
Data Needs and Coastal TWG activities in year
- Board decision on funding the proposed IM strategy was
- PIAG: (this item covered here, as some PIAG members
were not expected to be available the next day)
- The next public/roundtable meeting would be held
in Trois-Rivières, Quebec on November 26th.
- There will be six public meetings next year including
Toronto, Ontario; St. Regis (Akwesasne); Brockville,
Ontario; Wilson, NY; Sodus Bay, NY and around Lake St.
- All TWG outreach activities must be co-ordinated
- PIAG will add any TWG concerns or questions to its
- The Ripple newsletter will be published quarterly
in lieu of annual PIAG reports. Information published
will be based on input from TWGs.
- The proposed U.S. PIAG year 3 budget is $239,000.
- Rec. Boating:
- The Board approved the U.S. Rec. Boating TWG work
plan for year 3 including $30,000 US $'s for stakeholder
information transfer to be conducted by Dave White of
NOAA's Sea Grant Program.
- The meetings proposed in the survey will be done
as a PIAG activity, fully coordinated with PIAG, in
order to avoid public confusion.
- Total proposal for the TWG is $208,000 (US $'s).
- Com. Nav: $89,000 was approved for U.S. Com. Navigation
TWG work in year 3.
- Discussion on re-tooling POS
- Ed and Tony will continue to work on this item with input
from the TWGs in preparation of the December Board budget
conference call. The U.S. year 3 POS figure is $2,247,000.
- Review of action items from Ogdensburg Board meeting
- Awards: Ian Crawford and Sandy LeBarron will work
with IJC staff on this and report to the Board prior to
the January meeting.
- Propeller vibrations: Roger Haberly will contact
Henry Lickers about specific sites to be investigated.
- Substantive Board decisions: Wendy Leger is compiling
a list. GMs will check minutes for decisions and comments
will be included on the Study Gantt Chart.
- Update of water level issues and the St. Lawrence
Board of Control strategy
- Andre Carpentier gave an update of conditions and the
most recent Control Board strategy.
- As part of the PFEG work, Mark Lorie of the Corps of Engineers'
Institute for Water Resources is soliciting suggestions
from each Control Board member on how the Criteria can be
changed for better regulation. Also Doug Cuthbert has requested
the Control Board to provide a summary of operations during
2002 and suggestions on what criteria, if any, could be
added to keep water on the Lake after the seasonal peak.
- The Board proposed joint ½ day Control Board/Study
Board meeting is for Washington, DC in April 2003. This
will be co-ordinated with John Kangas, U.S. Secretary of
the Control Board.
- Wendy Leger and Bill Werick have been invited to observe
the Control Board meeting in March in Chicago.
- The Control Board is holding its next multi-city conference
call on March 18, 2003 in Hamilton, Montreal, Oswego and
- The Control Board is developing a CD on how the Lake Ontario-St.
Lawrence System works. It is holding its next public meeting,
tentatively, on June 16, 2003 at a Canadian location. With
this in mind, the Study Board will likely hold its next
public meeting in September 2003.
- Update of PIAG Activities (discussed previously)
- Communications plan
- The plan was approved as presented and will be distributed
- Other business: none.
- Future meetings and conference calls
- December 12, 2002: Budget Conference Call from 1000 to
- January 22-23, 2003: Board Meeting to discuss budget in
either Watertown or Alexandria Bay, NY. Sandy LeBarron to
assist with logistics.
- March 11-14, 2003: Board Meeting and PFEG workshop in
Submitted by Tony Eberhardt and Ed Eryuzlu, 12/6/02.